Skip to content
Bad Provenance

BT-2026.001

Ouija board

Type entry

Claim
4 of 5
Animals and crops destroyed, or lasting harm to the body, livelihood or estate.
Evidence
2 of 5
One retelling, publication or sale listing.
Production
manufactured continuously since 1891, under several owners.

These three figures are kept separate and are never combined into a single score. How grave the claim is, what it rests on, and whether the object can be traced are different questions. How the register reads them.

Asserted

Accounts attributed to a source. The register does not adopt them.

That it unsettles the minds of those who keep it. The board is said to open a channel to the dead or to something else, to answer questions through the planchette, and to admit an entity into the household if the session is not properly closed. Users are said to suffer disturbance of mind and behaviour afterwards. A body of rules travels with the object: never use it alone, always say goodbye, never burn it.

  • I3

    communicates in words

  • C6

    unease

  • C22

    mental disturbance

  • T8

    begins on an act

  • T18

    ends on a rite

  • E5

    a non-human entity attributed to it

    index v0.8: Non-human entity attributed

  • E9

    able to leave the object

  • E11

    serves as a channel for contact

  • X4

    bound to an accompanying instruction

    index v0.8: Bound to an accompanying text or instruction

  • H1

    made by or for a named person

reported by: since the late nineteenth century

Recorded

Established by the register, or received with the object.

File

Register number
BT-2026.001
Entry type
Type entry: a series or model, not one object
Opened
2026-09-16
Coded against
Claim Index v0.8

Object

Type
mass-produced talking board
Materials
board, printed paper or wood, plastic or wood planchette
Date
patented 1891
Origin
United States

On what grounds

Published retellings and pastoral accounts. Reported since the late nineteenth century. Evidence is capped at 3 by commercial interest; the entry stands at 2 on its sources alone.

Counter-indications

What weighs against the claim. These are never subtracted from a figure; the lowest applicable ceiling is applied instead.

  • CI6

    the motif recurs across unrelated objects

  • CI7

    an ordinary explanation has been offered

  • CI23

    those reporting the claims have a commercial interest in them

Mass production is not treated as a counter-indication here. It is the premise of a type entry.

Register findings

  • MT7

    price records on file

  • MT8

    replicas and competing versions marketed

  • MT26

    exhibited publicly

  • MT28

    has appeared in film and broadcast

Note. Clinical case literature, if it exists, would be a record made by a professional in the course of duty and would raise this entry's evidence score. The register is seeking it.

Back to the index