Skip to content
Bad Provenance

BP-2026.010.1

Hexham Heads

Claim
1 of 5
Possessions, or a person’s state of mind, affected in a way that passes.
Evidence
2 of 5
One retelling, publication or sale listing.
Provenance
0 of 3
The object cannot be produced.

These three figures are kept separate and are never combined into a single score. How grave the claim is, what it rests on, and whether the object can be traced are different questions. How the register reads them.

Asserted

Accounts attributed to a source. The register does not adopt them.

That being near them makes people uneasy. Two small heads dug up in a garden in 1971 are said to have moved on their own, to have been accompanied by a cold presence and by objects thrown about the house, and to have been followed by the appearance of a figure that was part man and part animal. The disturbances are said to have travelled with the heads to a second household and to have stopped when the heads were removed.

  • P11

    sensation on approach

  • P15

    apparition

  • P19

    visible movement

  • P20

    displacement unobserved

  • C6

    unease

  • T3

    passes by proximity or dwelling

  • E5

    a non-human entity attributed to them

    index v0.8: Non-human entity attributed

  • E9

    able to leave the object

  • H9

    subject of a ritual

    index v0.8: Subject of a ritual, curse or blessing

  • H21

    associated with a named legend or figure

reported by: five identifiable people between 1971 and 1976

Recorded

Established by the register, or received with the object.

File

Register number
BP-2026.010.1
Entry type
Object entry
Opened
2026-09-16
Coded against
Claim Index v0.8

Object

Type
two carved stone heads
Materials
stone or cast material — analyses disagree
Date
disputed; claimed as Iron Age, alleged as 1956
Origin
Northumberland, England
Whereabouts
the object cannot be produced. Last recorded around 1976

Custody

No custody record has been entered.

On what grounds

A contemporaneous newspaper report from March 1972 quoting the archaeologist in whose house the second set of disturbances occurred. Reported by five identifiable people between 1971 and 1976.

Counter-indications

What weighs against the claim. These are never subtracted from a figure; the lowest applicable ceiling is applied instead.

  • CI2

    sources conflict on the event

  • CI7

    an ordinary explanation has been offered

  • CI12

    a claim of fabrication has been made but is unresolved

  • CI18

    the record of ownership breaks

A local man came forward in 1974 saying he had made the heads from concrete in 1956 for his daughter, in the house where the finders later lived. Replicas he produced were judged insufficiently similar. A university examination found the heads to be cast rather than carved, which supports his account; geological analyses returned contradictory verdicts on their age. The heads went missing from a university department around 1976 and have not been seen since, which closes off any further examination.

Register findings

  • MT20

    recurring rite by a holder

  • MT26

    exhibited publicly

Back to the index